|
Cotton:
Market Outlook 2009-2013The U.S. upland cotton
sector enters the 21st century facing supply and demand challenges that
are related to both the domestic and international marketplace. Outside
the United States, cotton consumption recently has expanded faster than
production and has led to increased trade in raw cotton. Global textile
and apparel trade has also expanded, due largely to trade liberalization
measures and the continued strength of U.S. consumer demand for cotton
products. During the 1990s, the
domestic textile and apparel industry was the dominant customer of U.S.
cotton producers, accounting for approximately 60 percent of the total
demand for U.S. cotton. More recently, however, this share has fallen as
import competition from less expensive foreign cotton textile and apparel
products has displaced considerable demand for U.S.-produced products.
On the other hand, foreign demand for U.S. raw cotton has risen, resulting
in a larger share of U.S. cotton moving overseas. Consequently, the U.S.
cotton industry now faces increased global competition; and the effects
of these changes on the U.S. cotton sector have been evaluated and are
reviewed here. Each year, USDA updates
its 10-year projections of supply and utilization for major field crops
grown in the United States, including cotton. The commodity projections
are used to forecast farm program costs and to prepare President Obama’s
budget. One key use of the projections is as a “baseline” from which to
analyze the impacts of potential policy changes affecting U.S. agriculture. Upland US cotton planted
area is projected to decline slightly throughout the projection period,
yield offset the lower area, leading to relatively flat production. Meanwhile,
most of the US crop will be destined for overseas markets and global competition. Exports became the dominant
market for US upland cotton several years ago as the domestic textile industry
faced intense price competition from imported products. That competition
continues and is largely related to lower labor costs. The export-dominated
market for cotton is expected to remain throughout the projection period
as further reductions are foreseen for the domestic textile industry. As
a result of increased foreign competition, US cotton demand as a share
of global consumption is likely to decline slightly over time. The U.S. cotton industry
continues to face many of the supply and demand concerns confronting other
field crops. However, since cotton is used primarily in manufactured products,
the industry faces additional challenges associated with the economic well-being
of downstream manufacturing industries.
Cotton
Supply
Several factors underlie
the long-term trends that will determine US upland cotton supplies during
marketing years 2009-2013.US Upland Cotton Plantings
on a Slight Upward Trend.
Upland cotton planted area in the United States has been on a slowly rising
trend since the late 1960s, reversing the previous trend in cotton acreage.
However, the areas where upland cotton plantings occurred have fluctuated
considerably during this period. During the mid-1970s, cotton area moved
westward as Southeast production costs rose significantly due largely to
the crop-damaging effects of the boll weevil. By the 1990s, though, water
concerns in the West and the successful boll weevil eradication program
in the Southeast saw cotton returning eastward. Over the past several years,
upland cotton area has been about equally divided between the eastern half
(Southeast and Delta regions) and the western half (Southwest and West
regions) of the Cotton Belt. Farm Acts has facilitated some fluctuation
in upland cotton area as producers. Under limited planting
flexibility in marketing year 1995/96 (August-July), upland cotton area
reached a modern high of 16.7 million acres as producers responded to high
cotton prices. Since then, however, prices have moderated and net return
expectations for cotton and competing crops continue to drive acreage decisions.
Between 1996/97 and 2003/04, upland cotton area has ranged between 13.1
and 15.5 million acres, averaging approximately 14.2 million acres over
this period. Production has Stronger
Upward Trend.
Upland cotton production, like area, has seen an upward movement over the
past 20 years but the trend has been more pronounced. U.S. production gains
during the previous two decades have paralleled advances in technology
(seed varieties, fertilizers, pesticides, and machinery) and in production
practices (reduced tillage, irrigation, crop rotations, and pest management
systems). Results from these advances can be illustrated in the record
upland crop of 19.6 million bales in 2001/02 that surpassed the previous
1994/95 high.
Cotton
Demand
Several factors underlie
the long-term trends that will determine domestic and foreign demand for
U.S. upland cotton during marketing years 2009-2013.Per Capita Cotton Fiber
Demand up Dramatically.
U.S. cotton fiber demand on a per capita basis has seen significant gains
since the early 1980s as rising incomes and consumers’ preference for cotton
prompted a turnaround. Between calendar years 1966 and 1982, per capita
fiber demand for cotton products fell considerably, declining to only 13.5
pounds per person by 1982. Nevertheless, over 80 percent of these products
were produced in the United States during this period. That soon changed,
however, when imported products grew with the demand rebound, as evidenced
by the growing gap between mill demand and total cotton fiber demand.
U.S. Industry Restructuring
Began in the 1980s.
The U.S. textile and apparel industry began restructuring two decades ago.
First, the apparel industry—faced with rising labor costs—began moving
offshore as labor-intensive apparel items were finished abroad and exported
back to the United States. The Caribbean Basin Initiative and later, the
North American Free Trade Agreement sustained the U.S. textile industry
for a period as products containing U.S. components received preferential
treatment. However, trade liberalization that began during the mid-1990s—along
with the Asian financial crisis and the strength of the dollar—diminished
these benefits. As a result, increased
import competition required U.S. mills to reduce capacity and further modernize
or exit the industry as their customers moved overseas. Also, admission
of China to the World Trade Organization (WTO) provided additional access
to the U.S. market. Over the past 6 years in particular, the domestic industry
has faced intense competition from imported cotton textile and apparel
products that have grown considerably and supplanted U.S. cotton mill use.
While U.S. per capita cotton fiber demand has steadily risen to 35 pounds
recently, only one-third of this is now manufactured in the United States. Raw Cotton Exports
Importance Grows.
With the declines experienced in the domestic textile and apparel industries
since 1997/98, the relative importance of U.S. cotton exports has grown
dramatically. During the early 1980s, when U.S. cotton mill use began a
rebound, exports accounted for just over half of the total demand for U.S.
upland cotton. As mill use grew, the export share subsequently declined.
More recently, however, raw cotton exports and their share of U.S. demand
have grown considerably as record world cotton consumption has increased
the need for U.S. cotton overseas.
Baseline
Projections for U.S. Upland Cotton Supply and Use
Highlighted here are key
findings for U.S. upland cotton from the baseline analysis for marketing
years 2009-2013. Annual projection details can be obtained from the baseline’s
U.S. upland supply and use table.
During 2004/05-2013/14,
U.S. upland cotton demand is generally projected to offset production,
leaving ending stocks relatively stable. However, with the U.S. cotton
industry becoming an increasingly export-driven market, supply shocks in
the United States and other producing countries could lead to increased
annual variability in U.S. cotton demand. Role Reversal for the
Domestic Industry and U.S. Exports.
Although the U.S. domestic industry accounted for more than 60 percent
of the total U.S. upland cotton demand in 1997/98, the share has been cut
to one-third in 2003/04, and is projected to continue to decline over the
next 10 years. The U.S. textile industry has faced immense competition
from imported cotton products over the last 6 years and the trend is expected
to continue as WTO commitments require elimination of the remaining quotas
on textile and apparel products at the end of calendar year 2008. By 2013/14,
the domestic industry is expected to account for only about 25 percent
of the demand for U.S. upland cotton. In contrast, U.S. upland
cotton exports are expected to reach a record in 2009, accounting for two-thirds
of projected U.S. demand. As declines in the domestic industry provided
additional U.S. exportable supplies over the last several years, the gap
between foreign consumption and production provided the demand for U.S.
cotton. However, increased foreign competition in 2007/08 is likely to
reduce U.S. shipments of upland cotton during the first year of the projection
period before rebounding through 2013/14.
U.S. Share of World
Consumption Declines.
While rising U.S. cotton exports have bolstered the U.S. share of global
trade in recent years, the declines experienced by the domestic textile
industry have been somewhat offsetting. As a share of world cotton consumption,
U.S. cotton disappearance has been on a downward trend since 1994/95 when
U.S. cotton accounted for approximately 25 percent of global consumption.
In 2009, this share is expected to be near 20 percent, but declines are
projected throughout the baseline period as demand for U.S. cotton remains
stable and world cotton consumption continues to trend higher with population
and income growth. By 2013/14, the U.S. cotton demand share declines to
16 percent.
Global Imports Rise
Steadily. Imports
will account for about one-third of world use of all cotton (upland and
extra-long staple) in 2009. This share is expected to remain relatively
stable over the next 5years, and world cotton trade in 2013/14 is forecast
at 35.6 million bales, about 10 percent higher than in 2003/04. For hundreds
of years, importing countries have accounted for much of the world’s cotton.
Stocks Rise Slightly
Before Leveling Off.
Incomes, Preferences,
and Policy Drive Consumption.
Economic growth primarily determines cotton consumption. Changes in taste
are also a factor, and policy changes can shift fiber use as well. In China
and India, strong economic growth coincided with declining cotton consumption
for long periods in the last few decades as domestic policies encouraged
rapid growth in chemical fiber production and use as in cases, such as
in Russia and Eastern Europe during the 1990s. Demand for cotton grew steadily
and, since 1995, total world demand for cotton has grown 1.6 percent per
year. Over the 5-year projection period, global cotton consumption is expected
to grow about 1.3 percent annually as the global economy expands slightly
faster
Trade
The USDA baseline also provides
projections for trends in global cotton trade.During
the first part of the projection period, upland stocks and the stocks-to-use
ratio rise slightly. Ending stocks climb to about 4.7 million bales in
2006/07, while the stocks-to-use ratio increases to about 27 percent. Upland
stocks are then expected to level off, as production and demand are about
equal. Stocks decline to the 4.3-million-bale level during the latter part
of the baseline period, while the stocks-to-use ratio stabilizes around
25 percent, similar to the average over the past 10 years. After stagnating in the
early 1990s, world demand for cotton resumed its long run growth in recent
years. The world lost about 12 percent of its demand for cotton during
the early 1990s as real gross domestic product in Russia and Eastern Europe
fell by about one-third, and as yarn production shifted to countries whose
textile industries used fiber more U.S. upland cotton ending stocks and
the stocks-to-use ratio in 2004/05 are projected to be the lowest of any
year during the 10-year projection period and are considerably lower than
just a few years ago. The record production of 2001/02 forced upland stocks
to jump and as late as 1979 the imported share of the world’s cotton spinning
reached 46 percent. Later, spinning shifted to countries that grow rather
than import cotton, and only 28 percent of global cotton spinning used
imported cotton in 1998. More recently, major cotton growers, like China,
have also become significant importers, raising the imported share of consumption
once again. While many factors play
a role in determining cotton production, cotton’s long growing season and
need for adequate water and sunshine limit the ability of many countries
to produce. Therefore, although the world’s four largest consuming countries—China,
India, Pakistan, and the United States—are also the largest producing countries,
many important cotton consumers—such as Indonesia, Mexico, and Thailand—produce
almost no cotton at all. As a result, a much larger share of the world’s
cotton is traded between
Dry land cotton area has
expanded in India, West Africa’s Franc Zone, Eastern China, and Brazil.
For China and Brazil, this represented a rebound in area back to the levels
of the mid-1990s. However, new technology has meant substantially higher
yields and production. India’s yields have grown less, and West Africa’s
yields actually regressed. In 2003/04, India and Eastern China planted
area significantly below previous highs, and West Africa and Brazil have
prospects for adding new area in the future. The adoption of insect resistant
cotton varieties containing bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) has begun in India
and could lead to improvement in the country’s traditionally lagging yields.
Brazil’s yields are currently extremely high and future trends there will
depend on developments in insecticide resistance in Brazil’s new tropical
production zone. Future
Trade Prospects Face Uncertainties. World
trade will expand at about the 1.3-percent rate foreseen for expansion
in world cotton consumption over the next 10 years, sustaining U.S. exports
and the U.S. share of global trade. However, the United States is likely
to face continued competition from Australia and West Africa in the coming
years. Australia’s 2001/02-2003/04 drought has highlighted the dependence
of cotton producers on weather. Australia’s ability to produce even irrigated
cotton will continue to depend on the El Nino’s oscillations, and West
Africa’s output will depend on the longer cycles that have included sustained
precipitation since the beginning of the 1990s. Central Asia is unlikely
to return to its former status as the leading U.S. competitor in cotton
trade due to both reduced irrigation capacity that limits production and
increased domestic production of textiles that keeps more cotton in the
region. Brazil is expected once
again to be a major competitor of the United States. Area is expected to
grow in states like Mato Grosso, and improving transportation should facilitate
shipment to domestic mills and for export. A number of smaller Sub-Saharan
countries outside of West Africa—such as Tanzania, Uganda, and Zambia—liberalized
their economies during the 1990s and should see production and exports
continue to expand during the baseline period. China and India are expected
to continue importing rather than exporting. The impact of Bt cotton on
India’s output is a significant uncertainty over the next decade. China’s
cotton area in the past has been substantially higher than foreseen in
the baseline. With the adoption of Bt cotton, China would be unlikely to
import cotton if area returned to its previous highs.
U.S. Industry Is Facing
Many Issues
Call today and let us help you get an early and affordable start on your Cotton Picker Repair.
Web hosting and design by: JEDproducts.com Our Links Page |